A new study highlights how face-to-face trumps email

For complex tasks, face-to-face meetings are the better option.

Singdhi Sokpo

Many of us have probably had the thought: “That could’ve been an email.”

But a series of recent studies build a compelling case that some emails should, in fact, be meetings, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Researchers at Florida International University…

… arranged four experiments where they split participants into two groups. The first group performed tasks in person, while the second performed the same tasks over email.

  • The email group took 20 minutes to arrive at a sales strategy that took the face-to-face group six minutes.
  • Email participants also performed worse on a variety of ensuing tasks, from spotting grammar errors to deciphering logic problems.

The big takeaway? Email is best for simple tasks — but when things get complicated, it exacerbates the problem.

How can you prevent email paralysis?

Dr. Ravi Gajendran, author of the study, says regular meetings can help reduce the risk of getting stuck in endless email threads.

Great, so more meetings.

Get the 5-minute roundup you’ll actually read in your inbox​

Business and tech news in 5 minutes or less​

RECENT POSTS

Psst

How'd Bezos build a billion dollar empire?

In 1994, Jeff Bezos discovered a shocking stat: Internet usage grew 2,300% per year.

Data shows where markets are headed.

And that’s why we built Trends — to show you up-and-coming market opportunities about to explode. Interested?