Cities vs. slumlords

Subscribe for your daily dose of unconventional business news 🚀

Please provide a valid email address.

When a new company acquired her rent-stabilized Brooklyn apartment, Maria de la Rosa refused a buyout. Then came the leaks and the rats.

Cities vs. slumlords

According to New York Attorney General Letitia James, it was part of a scheme to oust tenants, flip their apartments, and make bank.

Who’d do such a thing?

Ink Property Group LLC, apparently. It bought up dozens of units, largely in low-income communities of color.

Tenants were illegally offered buyouts to leave. Those who stayed were harassed — against the law in NYC — with some watching as their buildings became uninhabitable through construction or neglect.

Ink also:

  • Lied to banks to get more favorable loans.
  • Averaged ~26 housing violations per building, including having lead-based paint.

And now?

Ink will pay up to $1.75m to an NYC agency that helps create affordable housing and $400k+ in restitution to the tenants. Meanwhile, 28 units will return to permanently affordable housing.

While anti-tenant harassment laws don’t solve the nationwide housing crisis or skyrocketing rent, many municipalities think they can help prevent homelessness.

  • California already has anti-tenant harassment laws, with individual cities adding their own ordinances to further define them.

Case in point: A Santa Monica, California, landlord was recently ordered to pay $65k for illegally harassing and evicting a tenant.

Related Articles

Get the 5-minute news brief keeping 2.5M+ innovators in the loop. Always free. 100% fresh. No bullsh*t.

Please provide a valid email address.

We're committed to your privacy. HubSpot uses the information you provide to us to contact you about our relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information, check out our privacy policy.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.