Does every societal conflict really require a corporate statement?

Subscribe for your daily dose of unconventional business news 🚀

Please provide a valid email address.

When news breaks, the typical brain goes many places: What happened? Who’s impacted? How does this change my world?

A sign disparaging Bud Light beer is seen along a country road.

Absent from that stewing mind: Hm, what does Taco Bell think about this?

Yet the current news cycle wouldn’t be complete without public statements from nearly every corporation under the sun, unleashing a cavalcade of condemnations, what-we-stand-fors, and deep sympathies.

As workplace tensions roil over corporate responses to the Israel-Hamas war, the question being asked anew: Exactly how necessary are those statements?

There’s no winning strategy here

Let’s acknowledge that executives are in an impossible spot here — there is rarely any victory found in taking a stand, only relief from dodging a disastrous loss.

Every scenario is its own unique parade through a field of land mine:

  • No two cultural moments can be approached with the same brand-response playbook: For instance, the George Floyd protests and the overturning of Roe v. Wade delivered entirely different complexities.
  • Penning a neutral, universally satisfying statement is virtually impossible.
  • Earnest statements can be perceived as performative; inauthentic statements can be their own PR disaster; either can quickly prompt internal discord among employees.

And the price for stepping in it can be high: 22% of Americans say they’ve boycotted a brand in the past year over corporate stances they don’t agree with, per decision intelligence company Morning Consult.

(Just ask Bud Light — its bottom line is still reeling from this summer’s boycott over its partnership with a transgender influencer.)

Is skipping a statement an option?

Perhaps, but the middle has also been unkind to brands, even the most unshakeable ones.

  • Harvard University, for one, faced backlash for not making an immediate statement on the Israel-Hamas crisis.

It also may not be the company’s choice. Starbucks was drawn into a firestorm when an employee union tweeted in support of Palestinians last month, leading to 1k+ complaints, vandalism, and in-store protests.

So, what the hell do you do if you’re in charge of a company?

Panic? Cry? All options for sure. But most prudent: Try to understand your employee and consumer bases; preferences about corporate activism are rapidly shifting and vary on demographic lines (more on that in the story below).

And honestly? Start by acknowledging that you’re in a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” scenario.

Get the 5-minute news brief keeping 2.5M+ innovators in the loop. Always free. 100% fresh. No bullsh*t.

Please provide a valid email address.

We're committed to your privacy. HubSpot uses the information you provide to us to contact you about our relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. For more information, check out our privacy policy.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.